Received: from relay6.UU.NET (relay6.UU.NET [192.48.96.16]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id PAA21341 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:25:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzugn28608; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:24:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA01597; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:23:56 -0500
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:23:56 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30d1cfc8.2760615@mail.ican.ca>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: poirierg@ican.ca (Gerald Poirier)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Out to Video
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:54:15 -0500, you wrote:
>One thing I would like to append to my message, the pvr does manage to
>exceed scsi2 speeds when sending output to video. It would have to, as full
>speed video frames at 30 per second is more than 40 MB per second. I have no
>idea how it does this, not owning one, but it does. I am pretty sure that it
>doesnt exceed PCI bus speeds though.
>
>Marcus
>
I understand that JPEG compression of varied quality, 4M, 5M, 6M /sec
make it possible. The 5M one would be equiv to BetaSP